Page 55 - October.indd
P. 55

was approaching aims of culturally relevant pedagogy,   ing these potential barriers is not to suggest that they are
        or when beliefs underlying her pedagogical actions co-  insurmountable, but rather that teachers can learn from

        hered with those identified in Ladson-Billings’s frame-  students’ perspectives and adjust practice accordingly.
        work. Gurgel’s scholarship broke new ground in choral
        research by exploring intersections of culturally relevant
        pedagogy and engagement theory to promote nuanced           Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy
        understandings of choral singers’ experiences. Her fi nd-  In one recent line of scholarship, Django Paris and


        ings challenge deficit-based notions of “classroom man-  H. Samy Alim have critiqued, refined, and extended
        agement,” instead highlighting possibilities for building   previous asset-based pedagogies,  particularly building
                                                                                        21
                                               15
        relationships within classroom communities  and fos-  upon Ladson-Billings’s conception of culturally rele-
                                                                         22
        tering singers’ genuine engagement through culturally   vant pedagogy.  Ladson-Billings herself has contrib-
        relevant pedagogy. 16                               uted toward these eff orts,  explaining that “culturally
                                                                                   23
           In a series of studies, I have explored how choral   sustaining pedagogy uses culturally relevant pedagogy
                                                                                            24
        teachers exemplify characteristics of culturally respon-  as the place where the beat drops.”  Paris and Alim
                               17
        sive and relevant teachers  as well as adolescent sing-  posited that the “culture of power” in schools is evolv-
        ers’ perspectives on their teachers’ efforts to enact these   ing as society becomes increasingly multilingual and

                              18
        pedagogical approaches.  One study detailed how in-  multiethnic:
        struction that was intended to be culturally responsive
        unfolded in three choirs situated in an urban center in   For too long we have taught our youth (and our
        the midwestern United States: one that served a size-  teachers) that… White middle-class normed
                                         19
        able im/migrant Hispanic and Latino  population, one   practices and ways of being alone are the key
        that had an African American classroom majority, and   to power, while denying the languages and oth-

        one comprised of students who identified with eighteen   er cultural practices that students of color bring

        distinct ethnicities. The students offered a range of cul-  to the classroom. Ironically, this outdated phi-
        tural perspectives, self-identifying as African American,   losophy will not grant our young people access
        Guatemalan, Honduran, Korean American, and Puer-       to power; rather, it may increasingly deny them
        to Rican, as well as biracial and multiethnic.         that access. 25
           Students perceived their instruction to be culturally
        responsive when given opportunities to deepen their   They observed that educators have “responded” to
        understanding of their own culture(s) and to broaden   elements of student culture only in service to the goal
        their horizons by learning about additional cultures,   of adopting the White middle-class dominant cultural
        outcomes that correspond with Ladson-Billings’s con-  norms that schools position as “legitimate.” Too often,
        cept of cultural competence. They valued when teach-  this process requires students to sacrifi ce connections to

        ers invested effort to develop knowledge of the culture(s)   their own cultural heritage or identity. Therefore, they

        with which their students identified, and when they took   argue that terms such as “culturally relevant” and “cul-
        steps to enhance the cultural validity  of learning ex-  turally responsive” do not go far enough toward refl ect-
                                         20
        periences based on those cultures. Singers also identi-  ing the ultimate aims of these pedagogical approaches:
        fied barriers to culturally responsive and relevant choral

        teaching: teachers’ lack of knowledge, preparation, or   [T]he term “relevant” does not do enough to

        confidence to facilitate experiences based on culture(s)   explicitly support the goals of maintenance and
        with which they were less familiar; “one-off ” experienc-  social critique. It is quite possible to be relevant
        es with repertoire that did not go far enough toward   to something without ensuring its continuing
        cultural responsiveness; and teaching processes that fo-  and critical presence in students’ repertoires of
        cused on musical elements while neglecting to address   practice…and its presence in our classrooms
        important social, cultural, historical, and political con-  and communities. 26
        text surrounding the music being studied. Acknowledg-

        CHORAL JOURNAL  October 2022                                                                           Volume 63  Number 3            53
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60