Page 55 - CJOct25

27
to incorporate vocal exercises into the warm-up, aim- served across voice categories. Furthermore, warm-
ing to provide a comprehensive and balanced opportu- ing up has been found to promote more resonant and
18
nity for skill development across the ensemble. On the in-tune singing in particular choral contexts, to impact
other hand, singing voice teachers have the advantage phonation threshold pressure (though effects may dif-
of working one-on-one with singers, allowing them to fer between individuals), and to enhance the regularity
28
provide specific technical exercises tailored to each stu- and stability of vibrato for some singers. A study by
dent. This personalized approach enables the singing Edward Połrolniczak and Michał Kramarczyk aimed
voice teacher to address specific technical challenges to assess the potential positive impact of vocal func-
and facilitate targeted skill development. 19 tion exercises on vocal quality. Their analyses yielded
For a choral director overseeing a large and diverse noteworthy improvements across a wide range of pa-
ensemble, engaging all students simultaneously can be rameters. The findings indicate that engaging in vocal
challenging, which makes the inclusion of focusing ex- technique exercises as part of a warm-up enhances
20
29
ercises crucial. High school students exposed to con- “the regularity of the acoustic signal of singing.” Ac-
stant noise during bus commutes, in hallways, cafete- cording to Jo Levett and Tim Pring’s research, includ-
rias, lively classrooms, the school bell, and during sports ing choir warm-up sessions is important for amateur
activities must transition to focused listening when they singers who may lack awareness of vocal health risks
enter rehearsals. It therefore becomes challenging and how to address them. Although some studies pro-
30
21
for choral directors to enhance the auditory sharpness pose that tailored voice function exercises conducted
and mental alertness of singers. The choral director over several weeks could potentially improve a singer’s
22
faces the task of motivating and sustaining the inter- vocal range, Frank Ragsdale and colleagues deter-
31
est of multiple singers with different vocal needs in a mined that there is no uniform or optimal duration of
group setting. To achieve this, the choral director em- warm-ups that results in both objective and subjective
ploys diverse content, energetic pacing, and efficiently improvement in voice quality.
32
covers a wide range of choral concepts in innovative The complexity of warm-up considerations and the
ways. When comparing individual singing voice les- self-perception of singers is further evident in a study
23
sons and choir settings, however, there is a distinction conducted by Lynda Moorcroft and Dianna Kenny,
in the application of focusing exercises. In individual who recorded singers performing eight measures of a
voice lessons, these exercises are generally considered classical aria. Six highly trained listeners then rated
33
unnecessary due to the one-on-one setting, which tends the singers’ vocal quality and attempted to identify if
to promote individual motivation and focus throughout the recording was pre- or postvocal warm-up. Based
24
the lesson. In this setting, there is less need to direct on their self-ratings, all singers agreed that their tone
the student’s focus, allowing for extensive and detailed quality had improved significantly after twenty-five
work to be undertaken during warm-up through both minutes of vocal exercises. However, the expert listen-
functional and technical exercises. ers could not reliably determine whether the voices had
improved. Similarly, Carla Ann Helmbrecht’s study on
warm-ups also found that some singers believed their
Voice Science and Warming Up warm-up routine improved their vocal quality, although
Of note for this discussion is that voice science and analyses of voice quality (objective measurements of
singer perceptions can vary regarding the role, nature, vocal perturbation and formant structure) revealed that
and effectiveness of the warm-up. There also appears their warm-up method was ineffective and produced
25
to be no clear consensus among practitioners regard- “the opposite of the desired effect, which might even
ing the definition and purpose of warming up. De- be harmful to the voice.” Another study that aligns
26
34
spite this, some studies provide evidence supporting the with these findings is the exercise duration research
physiological advantages of warming up. For example, conducted by Ragsdale and colleagues who examined
research has shown that warming up can enhance vo- nine classical vocalists over five weeks. Again, expert
35
cal quality in female singers, albeit with variations ob- listeners found no significant differences in vocal quali-

CHORAL JOURNAL October 2025 Volume 66 Number 3 53