Page 41 - October.indd
P. 41

Ralph Vaughan Williams






                         20
        bivalent harmony”  and “the scoring throughout is   most important of the English reformation. Vaughan
        beautifully judged, the wordless voices in particular   Williams used the text of the Psalm by Sternhold and
        adding a purely human and partly mystical ardor to   Hopkins, however, presumably the edition published
        the music rather than projecting any philosophic or   at Geneva in 1561, instead of the text of The English
        impersonal timelessness, as they do in some other of   Hymnal version (a translation from the French), which
                  21
        his works.”  Similarly Dickinson refl ected: “The novel   it pre-dated by almost 300 years.
        interest is, of course, the intrinsic quality of the viola    The Fantasia is in fact an assemblage of quasi vari-
        part, and of voices used as a special reed-chorus in   ations scored for pianoforte solo accompanied by cho-
        conjunction with solo wood and brass and incidentally   rus and orchestra. Howes provides a concise overview.
        a tuneful celesta.” 22                              “There are seven variations in all, of which two are for
                                                            piano alone; in the other fi ve the chorus sings verses 1
                                                            and 2 and verses 31, 32, and 33 of Psalm CIV. There
                                                            is an Introduction in which the piano evolves the tune

           From the moment of its premiere,                 out of its chief motif of four notes. The theme is then
           Flos Campi has been explored in                  stated by the piano alone in very full, if not very ortho-
                                                            dox, harmonies”  and, thereafter, the work proceeds
                                                                           27
           the Vaughan Williams literature by a             variation by variation; in other words: introduction
           number of authors, who attempted to              plus theme, variation one (verse one); variation two
           understand and elucidate its meaning,            (piano cadenza); variation three (verse two); variation

           evaluate its compositional features, and         four (verses three and four); variation five (piano ca-
                                                            denza); variation six (verse five); and variation seven

           debate its place in the canon of the             (elements of verse one).
           composer.                                          To Dickinson the Fantasia falls into three stages—(1)
                                                            Prelude, Theme, and Two Variations; (2) Three Vari-
                                                            ations; and (3) Two Variations and Coda (thus imply-

                                                            ing a tripartite form). The first stage commences in D
            The signifi cance of Flos Campi was recognized by   minor “with the piano trying out phrases” but shifts
        Foss, who considered it “one of [Vaughan Williams’s]   to F minor for an initial presentation of the theme “in
                                                  23

        most original, and most important, expressions,”  and   a trenchant multiple texture.” The first verse is char-
        Kennedy, who posited a status for the suite as “tru-  acterized by “choral polyphony, with piano bravura,”
        ly inimitable, a masterpiece.”  Indeed, in Flos Campi,   followed by “an orchestral verse with choral extensions
                                  24
        Vaughan Williams reinterpreted the genres (cantata,   of each phrase, borrowing text from the fi rst verse.” 28
        concerto, and suite are fused, choral expression and   Dickinson’s second stage begins in B modal minor
        verbal communication are separated) and his ingredi-  with “a free and extended interlude for piano.” A sec-
        ents (biblical, erotic, oriental, pastoral, and primitive)   ond verse in D minor involves “choral unison in four-
        to create this work sui generis. 25                 time, with the piano harping on the fourth phrase.”
           “Fantasia (Quasi Variazione) on the ‘Old 104th’ Psalm   Thereafter, “a third verse absorbs ‘How sundry, O
        Tune” (1949), for piano solo, chorus, and orchestra was   Lord’, etc., in fugued entries that do not go beyond

        composed for the Gloucester Festival of 1950, with   the first melodic phrase and may be regarded as a fi xa-
                                    26
        Michael Mullinar as the soloist.  It consists of a set of   tion prompting a return to F minor, in which the piano
        variations (15 minutes) on the imposing and severe tune   leads the orchestral bass in a massive fourth verse.” 29
        attributed to Thomas Ravenscroft (c.1582-c.1635),     Dickinson’s third stage is initiated by “another long
        “Disposer Supreme and Judge of the Earth” (assigned   piano interlude, emulating Busoni in style (or, more
        the number 178 in The English Hymnal), and taken from   nearly, Liapunov’s  Variations on a Russian Folk-song).”
        his psalter, The Whole Booke of  Psalmes (1621), one of the   This is “sobered down to a choral unison verse in D


        CHORAL JOURNAL  October 2022                                                                           Volume 63  Number 3            39
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46