Page 34 - October.indd
P. 34

Heinrich Schütz (1585–1672): Choral Composer Extraordinaire






            instrumental voices).                           29    Schütz uses the same type of organization to order both
        19                                                      parts of the Kleine geistliche Konzerte.
            The distinction between  Favoriti  and  Capelle is visually
            clearer in Philipp Spitta’s nineteenth-century  Schütz   30   Geistliche Chor-Music, NSA 5, ed. Wilhelm Kamlah (Kassel:
            Ausgabe than in the Neue Schütz Ausgabe.            Bärenreiter Verlag, 1968).
        20    Wedgewood, 60–61.                             31
                                                                 In his Preface, Kamlah indicates that motets 8, 12, 13, 20,
        21                                                      and 25 appear at original pitch; the rest (save 24) are
             Schütz’s publisher knew that potential buyers of this work
            would balk if no continuo part had been provided,   transposed up a major 2nd. Kamlah fails to include a
            proving how widely accepted the device had become.  Critical Report or incipits that show the original clefs
        22                                                      of the works, making determination of mode virtually
           NSA, vols. 8–9, ed. Gottfried Grote (Kassel: Bärenreiter
            Verlag, 1960). (Hereafter, Grote) The motets referred to   impossible.
            in the text are Turbabor, sed non perturbator (SWV 70); Ecce   32    According to Smallman, 128, two other motets—Ein Kind
            advocatus meus (SWV 34); and the three-part setting of   ist uns geboren (SWV 384) and Ich weiss das mein Erlöser lebt
            Psalm 6, Domine, ne in furore tuo arguas me (SWV 85–87).   (SWV 393)—suggest earlier dates of origin.
        23    This example (and those that follow) replicate Schütz’s   33   Smallman, 126. The original German text is “Worbey der
            original notation. In the NSA¸ Gottfried Grote      Bassus Generalis, auff Gutachten und Begehren / nicht aber aus

            transposes the motets to what he regards as a more   Notwendigkeit / zugleich auch zu befi nden ist.”
            singable pitch level. Said transposition, while practical,   34
                                                                 Ibid., 127.
            completely obliterates any hope of understanding the   35    Interestingly, the two motets that are completely vocal
            mode used in each motet. The new edition of the     both seem to stem from an earlier time: SWV 393:
            Cantiones sacrae by Walter Werbeck and Heide Volckmar-  Ich weiss dass mein Erlöser lebt and SWV 395: Der Engel
            Waschk (Kassel: Bärenreiter Verlag, 2004) restores the   sprach zu den Hirten. (The OUP style sheet or NG2 list of
            motets to their original pitch levels.              abbreviations uses caps for solo voices and lower case for
        24                                                      choral voices.) SWV 395 is the German contrafact of
            These include the Passion cycle (SWV 56–60); In te, domine
            speravi (SWV 66); Sicut Moses serpentem in deserto exaltavit   A. Gabrieli’s Angelus ad pastores ait, published in the 1587
            (SWV 68); Ad dominum cum tribularer (SWN 71); and the   print Concerti di Andrea ed Giovanni Gabrieli. However, SWV
            Table Graces (SWV 836–40).                          393, while not demonstrably the reworking of another
        25                                                      composition, features the homophonic style and varied
             In fact, the five-motet Passion cycle (SWV 56–60) reveals its
            Phrygian character by making cadences to the fi nal and   voice groupings found in Venetian choral music.
            both reciting tones. The first ends in A (the reciting tone   36    In her monograph on Dietrich Buxtehude (New York:

            of the plagal mode); the second in C (the reciting tone   Schirmer, 1987), the musicologist Kerala Snyder points
            of the authentic mode); and, quite tellingly, the third,   out that the term “aria” refers to the setting of a strophic
            ends on the forbidden pitch B (forbidden because of its   text of the type included by Giulio Caccini in Le Nuove
            long-standing association with the tritone, the diabolus in   Musiche. Also referred to as “strophic bass variations,”
            musica), to indicate how far the poet feels estranged from   such “arias” feature a repeated bass line, diff erent

            and forsaken by God. The fourth and fifth motets end   melodies, and a consistently homophonic texture used
            on G and E, respectively.                           for each verse. For an example, see Buxtehude’s cantata
        26                                                      Membra Jesu Nostri (BuxWV 75.2).
            Schütz uses this same “sprung” rhythm in two settings of
            the Lord’s Prayer—the first in the Cantiones sacrae (Latin,   37    This example is, like the NSA edition, transposed a major

            SWV 89) and the second in SWV 411, Vater unser, der   second higher than the original.
            du bist im Himmel (Symphoniae sacrae III)—at the text “but
            deliver us from evil.”
        27   Song of Solomon 4:9.
        28   The author has not only successfully performed all these
            motets but has also published an edition of the Pater
            noster (SWV 89) with Roger Dean Music, 15/2445R.


        32     CHORAL JOURNAL  October 2022                                                   Volume 63  Number 3
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39