Page 45 - Mar_Apr23
P. 45

Other indirect routes for possibly accessing Content   match, you can appeal it through YouTube to get the
          ID and/or monetizing  your copyrighted  content  on   claim removed.
          YouTube include third-party administrators such as:   Second, you may have noticed Art Videos on You-
                                                              Tube. These play audio provided by a record label (or
          • SongTrust, which, as part of their overall adminis-  a distributor like CD Baby) to Youtube Music while dis-
              tration of digital audio/video royalties related to   playing the album cover for the duration of the track.
              your musical works, can register your eligible mu-  These videos are treated differently than all the video
              sical works with Content ID. However, for com-  situations mentioned previously. Art Videos are treated
              posers who already have a publisher administering   like interactive audio streams (since they are a “spill-
              any publishing rights (e.g. a sheet music publisher,   over” from YouTube Music, an interactive streaming
              or CD Baby Pro, or self-administering some rights   audio DSP, into YouTube) and are not dependent on
              on self-published  songs), signing up  with Song-  matching from  Content  ID. These  videos therefore
              Trust could create rights administration conflicts,   generate  three  revenue  streams  even  if  you  haven’t
              so it may not be a viable option for many.      qualified for Content ID:

          • The Harry Fox Agency (HFA) offers collection of   1)  Mechanical royalties, collected  through the
              mechanical royalties  from  a variety  of sources,   MLC. Mechanical royalties are not paid on any
              including physical products (CDs), international    other type of YouTube video, but since art videos
              mechanical royalties, and YouTube/Content ID,       are treated as interactive audio streams, these gen-
              as well as other types of non-mechanical licens-    erate mechanical royalties to the publisher.
              ing for  an 11.5% commission. Note  that  HFA
              does not collect from The MLC for its members,   2)  Performance Royalties, reported by YouTube to
              though, so publishers who affiliate with HFA still   the PRO as part of their licensing agreement; the
              need to become members of The MLC.                  PRO then pays the publisher and writer(s).
                                                  4

          •  Companies like AdRev may also be an option—not   3) Ad Revenue: on Art Videos, these are paid by You-
              through Content ID but by actively searching for    Tube only to the  record label  (or  to CD Baby/
              your content on YouTube and claiming the rev-       other distributor), not divided with the publisher,
              enue. Depending on your situation, these services   because the publisher will collect Mechanical roy-
              may or may not be available to you, and may or      alties.
              may not capture enough revenue to be worth the
              effort or cost involved.                        Other details for streaming video revenue:


            These options may have drawbacks that make them   Performance  Royalties: Both YouTube and Face-
          less than ideal solutions for choral composers, so many   book have contractual agreements with ASCAP (and
          choral composers are not currently collecting revenue   other PROs) and pay blanket license fees to cover the
          through Content ID. However, in spite of all this there   “public performance”  aspect of videos of music  on
          are still two bits of good news for choral composers   their  platforms. YouTube performance royalties  are
          seeking to collect revenue on YouTube:              generated by reported data of actual plays ; but Face-
                                                                                                   5
            First, even without Content ID, when you upload vid-  book doesn’t send actual usage data. Instead, ASCAP
          eos of your own work to your own monetized Youtube   creates “proxy Facebook performances” based on the
          channel, you should be able to collect ad revenue on   ASCAP music that was performed across all types of
          your own videos (even if not on anyone else’s videos   media they survey. This is why you may see “Facebook
          containing your music, the way you would with Con-  Proxy” payments in your PRO’s statement; if a work of
          tent  ID).  If  you get  a  copyright  claim on your  own   yours is included in an ASCAP distribution one quar-
          video from another recording of your work, or a mis-  ter, it  will automatically  generate  “proxy”  Facebook

          CHORAL JOURNAL  March/April 2023                                                                                  Volume 63  Number 7            43
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50