Page 55 - CJSeptember25
P. 55

Pedagogical Tools                   mance venue—more toward mezzo forte to forte—but
           In  order  to  establish  a  working  pedagogy  for  jazz  the use of extreme dynamics should still be avoided for
         singers, it is important to identify and implement these  the most part in order to maintain the integrity of the
         features. Keep in mind that the same pedagogy applies  styles and avoid lapsing into a “belt” sound. This often
         to jazz solo singing and to jazz group singing; the only  happens if students are in a school musical and singing
         real difference is that a jazz solo singer can use a wid-  in the vocal jazz group. They forget to distinguish be-
         er palette of colors, timbres, and unique sounds than  tween styles.
         members of a group can for obvious reasons. Therein
         lies an important reason to study recordings.      2) Resonance and the microphone
                                                              Measuring  resonance  in  a  jazz  singer’s  tone  and
         1) Jaw position and microphone proximity           comparing it  to  resonance in a classical singer’s tone
           Because the microphone is a part of the character  reinforces statement  one.  VoceVista  spectrograms are
         of the “whole sound,” the jazz singer should place less  usually set at 5000 to 8000 Hertz (HZ) when studying
         emphasis  on  natural/acoustical  projection  and  more  vocal behaviors of classical singers but are set at 3000
         emphasis on the relationship between the microphone,  to 5000 HZ when studying the vocal behaviors of jazz
         the voice, and the dynamic content. The vocal tract (a  singers. The exact HZ settings depend on whether one
         combination of resonating chambers) is not as open/  is looking at a male voice or a female voice and on the
         expanded as that of the classical singer. Too much res-  category of each voice (e.g., soprano, alto). The natural-
         onance and too much volume/intensity will distort the  ly projected acoustical properties of the classical sing-
         amplified sound. The open/dropped jaw used in tra-  er registers significant acoustic activity in the first (F1)
         ditional choral singing is only used in jazz singing to  through the sixth (F6) Formants (and occasionally high-
         sing at loud dynamic levels or for holding certain “long”  er) on a spectrogram, while the microphone singer’s be-
         notes for an extended time for some dramatic effect. If  haviors are mostly registered in Formants 1, 2, and 3. (A
         the singer or singers think about the distance between  Formant is a group of overtones that indicates bands of
         the upper back and lower back teeth (as opposed to how  energy on a spectrogram.) We must consider resonance
         open the mouth is) as being somewhere between a third  in the tone in degrees when teaching jazz singers, and
         and a half an inch depending on the singer’s physical  this can happen rather naturally by simply adjusting the
         makeup, it will assist microphone compatibility, give the  jaw opening and adjusting the palate higher or lower.
         tongue room to function, and the singer will be able to  If the palate is too low, the sound will be nasal; if the
         better manage the amount of resonance in the tone and  palate is too high, the sound will be too full and too res-
         still have a relaxed, loose jaw without it being too open.  onant to remain microphone compatible.
         As for the relationship between the lips and the micro-
         phone, a good rule of thumb might be: a) “mouth to the  3) Tongue activity and tone colors
         metal” or one finger’s distance when placing the index   There is often weak spectrographic activity in devel-
         finger vertically between the lips and the microphone; b)  oping jazz singers in Formant 2 (F2), indicating that the
         two fingers distance (placing the index and middle fin-  tongue is not functioning correctly for this kind of sing-
         gers together vertically between the lips and the ball of  ing. An argument can be made that the singer might
         the microphone) for a fuller, well-balanced group sound  be  trying  to  not  over-enunciate  for  fear  of  sounding
         for moderate swinging tunes, and Bebop tunes with lots  “too  trained” and  therefore  inauthentic,  but  an  inac-
         of lyrics and/or scat syllables; c) a fist’s distance between  tive tongue is not the answer. The most efficient way to
         the lips and the microphone for gospel and R&B styles.  “manage” resonance and diction and increase individu-
         Most microphone singing should be executed between  al colors/timbres in the tone of the microphone singer,
         mezzo piano and mezzo forte. In a thirty-two-plus voice  thus strengthening the F2, is to keep the tongue active.
         group where close-up microphones are not used, the dy-  Even though we are not relying on natural projection,
         namics can be adjusted to a slightly more intense degree  the tip of the tongue must remain active so as to produce
         depending on the strength of the voices and the perfor-  clarity of diction. The middle of the tongue cannot re-

        CHORAL JOURNAL September 2025                                                                                     Volume 66  Number 2          53
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60