Page 22 - October.indd
P. 22

Heinrich Schütz (1585–1672): Choral Composer Extraordinaire






          Here, despite the use of imitation, we become aware   g–C). Such imitative repetition of the same material is
        that this is imitation of a fundamentally diff erent type   a device often encountered in the Cantiones and in other
        and function. The plunging sixteenth notes sound like   collections (notably, the “Psalms of David”). This type
        a violent shudder; they scream secunda prattica, captur-  of pre-tonal thinking suggests that the music grows
        ing the sense of the text, “I am the blow of your pain.”   by moving away from and returning to a tonal center.

        The first four entries all descend from e to g    in a manic   The other indisputable takeaway from this example is
        stretto, followed by a fifth entry in the soprano starting   that Schütz’s process is inherently “madrigalistic.” The

        on b, the forbidden dominant of the mode. But the real   three iterations of “Cruciatus tui labor” each prove a

        essence of the piece appears in the progression that   musical portrayal of the crucified Jesus, each one more
        closes this brief excerpt—Schütz’s signature augment-  dissonant than its predecessor.
        ed sixth chord (a–c   –f natural) plus a wrenching 4–3   Another wonderful example of musical pictorial-
        suspension in the alto. While imitation is everywhere   ism occurs in the eleventh motet, Ego dormio, et cor meum
        present, it is not the type found in Renaissance motets;   vigilat (“I sleep but my heart keeps watch”). Beginning
        after the canonic stretto of the opening, the succeed-  in m. 14, Schütz sets the text “aperi mihi” (“open to
        ing imitative phrase openings do all sorts of things that   me”) by employing imitation that literally “opens up”
                                                                                               26
        boggle the mind—inversion, entries on the members   by having voices enter in close stretto  (Figure 4 on
        of an A minor triad (mm. 12–13). All of this culminates   page 22).
        in the searing dissonances of the text, “I caused the   Here, the four voices enter on successive quarter
        wounds of your passion, the labor of your crucifi xion”   notes, a pattern that continues through three sequential
        (Figure 3 on page 21).                              repetitions. Another device, favored by such madrigal
                                                            composers as Luca Marenzio and Claudio Montever-
                                                            di, is the simultaneous appearance of two diff erent

           Cantate Domino (SWV 81), the only one of         themes (setting different texts). Beginning in m. 18, the
           the forty motets set completely in triple        bass and soprano repeat this imitative sequence, while
                                                            the alto and tenor set the words soror mea, columba mea,
           meter, is by far the most often performed        immaculata mea (“my sister, my dove, my immaculate
                                                                  27
           motet from this collection.                      one”). Finally, the prima pars of Schütz’s setting of

                                                            Ps. 6 (Domine ne in furore tuo arguas me) exemplifies a com-
                                                            position that is inconceivable without the presence of
                                                            continuo (Figure 5 on page 23).
          Here, consonant duets in thirds overlap to produce   Beginning in m. 10, Schütz sets the text Miserere mei
        brief, exquisite dissonances, again featuring that signa-  (“Have mercy on me”) twice in successive statements
        ture augmented 6th chord. The entire passage, which   by the soprano and alto. Both phrases involve the de-
                                                                                                  1
                                                                                        2   1

        starts a measure earlier than the example and is miss-  scent of a diminished octave (f –f  and g –g ), an in-
        ing the concluding five measures, is a varied repeat of   terval impossible to sing without the sustained continuo

        the same melodies that cycle through the circle of fi fths   beneath. Another madrigalism appears in m. 18, where
        from A to C (the reciting tone of e hypophrygian). 25  the alto and bass both sing “infi rmus sum” (“I am weak”);
        This example reveals yet another, diff erent type of im-  Schütz portrays the word “weak” by writing a simulta-
                                                                               1

        itation. The imitation is between pairs of voices that   neous  cross relation (f  [A]–f  [B]). Again, the presence
        outline the second inversion of a triad. This texture   of a continuo part that doubles these pitches is essential
        (and its musical predecessors) repeats three times: on   to a successful performance.
        the triads of a minor, d minor, and g minor. Schütz    Cantate Domino (SWV 81), the only one of the forty
        repeats the same material three times to generate a for-  motets set completely in triple meter, is by far the most
        mal design based on the circle of fifths, working back-  often performed motet from this collection. Other

        wards from the third iteration ending on C (thus, a–d   recommendations would include any of the  fi rst  ten

        20     CHORAL JOURNAL  October 2022                                                   Volume 63  Number 3
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27