Page 30 - CJMarch_April25
P. 30

SERGE JAROFF’S DON COSSACK CHOIR:                 A TREASURE FROM THE RUSSIAN DIASPORA






        and unfamiliar repertoire irrelevant. Constant dramatic   cert and watched him intently. He used subtle hand mo-
        variations in tempi and dynamics were an especially   tions and poignant facial expressions to evoke the effects
                                                                     29
        moving hallmark of their style. Their attacks, cutoffs,   he wanted.  Rachmaninov, who was a strong supporter
        intonation, diction, and blend were so precise that many   of the choir and had mentored Jaroff early on, had ad-
                                                                                       30
        reviewers described their technique as perfect. Distin-  vised him to conduct this way.  Fortunately, there are
                                                 20
        guished music critic Deems Taylor stated that they were   numerous film clips from earlier and later in his life that
        the best chorus he ever heard or ever hoped to hear. 21   show him doing so (Photo 2 on the next page).
        The famous German orchestral conductor Herbert von    Commentators  constantly  marveled  at  his  physical
        Karajan was once asked if there were any choirs that   restraint. Far more importantly, however, Jaroff inter-
        particularly impressed him. He said there was one: Ja-  preted  every  work  the  choir  performed  in  extraordi-
        roff’s Don Cossacks. He attended all their concerts to try   narily minute detail, which resulted in the constant ex-
        to figure out how Jaroff obtained his powerful, precise   pressive nuances that moved audiences so deeply.
        attacks but never succeeded. 22

                                                                             Arrangements
                      The Move to America                     Jaroff arranged most of the choir’s music, and his
           The choir was based in Berlin and toured mostly in   innovations in voicings and timbre set his arrangements
                                                                                     31
        Europe in the 1920s, but in 1930, they began touring in   apart. He included falsettists  to sing treble parts. This
        the United States. Despite Jaroff’s apprehensions, they   made mixed-choir repertoire from the Russian Ortho-
        were immediately a great success in various regions of   dox canon possible. He stated in a rare interview that he
        the country and were eagerly invited back every year. 23   divided the choir into falsettist, first tenor, second tenor,
        As  newspaper  reviews  document,  they  performed  in   baritone, bass, and octavist sections, often with further
                                                                    32
        diverse  venues,  ranging  from  Carnegie  Hall  and  the   divisions.  The octavist range for which Russian choirs
        Metropolitan Opera House to school auditoriums in   are famous is an octave below the normal bass range.
        small cities.                                       His frequent octavist doubling of bass lines and place-
           Most  of  the  choristers  had  fought  in  two  wars:   ment of lyrical melodies in the falsettist register focused
        World War I and the Russian Civil War. Dismayed by   attention on his superb octavist and falsettist sections
        the military buildup they witnessed in Europe in the   and gave the choir a signature sonority that was aesthet-
                                                                               33
        early 1930s, which suggested that more war was im-  ically very compelling.
               24
        minent,  Jaroff made the dramatic decision to move    Homophonic texture and basic tonal harmony typify
        the choir members to New York and to seek Ameri-    the liturgical and secular works in the choir’s repertoire.
        can citizenship.  With help from Bronson M. Cutting   This reflects the fact that Western-influenced classical
                      25
        (1888-1935), a United States senator from New Mexico   music in Russia has a relatively short history. Ukrainian-
                             26
        who was an ardent fan,  they gained permanent-res-  born composer Dmitry Bortniansky (1751–1825), who
        ident status in 1936 and citizenship in 1943 and were   is  best remembered for his  choral works, is  generally
                                       27
        based in New York from then on.  Members of the     recognized as Russia’s first great master of that west-
                                                                                                           34
        American choral community had ample opportunity to   ernized  style,  which  he  learned  from  study  in  Italy.
        experience their artistry, and it was reported that they   The choir’s repertoire encompassed his works through
        learned much from the Don Cossacks.                 those of nineteenth-century and early twentieth-centu-
                                          28
                                                            ry masters.
                                                              A notable example of the latter is Alexander Kastal-
                      Jaroff as Conductor                   sky  (1856–1926),  who  was  director  of  the  Synodal
           Serge  Jaroff’s  conducting  style  was  unusually  re-  School from 1910 to 1918 when Jaroff studied there. He
        strained. The singers, who numbered twenty-two after   championed the “New Direction” movement in Rus-
        World War II, stood in two parallel lines or arcs in con-  sian sacred choral music, which sought to create an au-



        28      CHORAL JOURNAL  March/April 2025                                               Volume 65  Number 7
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35