Page 38 - Mar_Apr23
P. 38

The Business of Composing, Part 2 - Licensing




                            Key Terms                         censes and royalties have existed for decades, but their
            Licensing refers to all the ways that composers and   meanings/applications have broadened in the internet
          publishers (as well as performing artists, sound record-  era. First, let’s get an overview of the traditional (pre-
          ing owners, etc.) grant permission and collect revenue   digital era) applications of these terms, and how they’ve
          for various uses of their copyrighted work beyond the   expanded in the digital era; then we’ll get into the de-
          sale  of the  original  sheet  music.  Selling  sheet  music   tails of how the digital era works.
          is  usually  the  more  profitable  income  stream;  many
          licensing  situations  do  not  yield  significant  income.
          However, licensing can be lucrative in certain situations   Traditional Licensing (Pre-Digital Era)
          (i.e. if a composer’s music is used on a widely-broadcast   A recorded  performance (audio  and/or video) of
          TV show or commercial), and even the smaller aspects   music has various aspects of ownership that are essen-
          of licensing can add up to worthwhile income.       tial to understand:
            Most types of licensing generate royalties, which
          are typically paid to the publisher and then split 50/50   • The “musical work,” sometimes called “underly-
          between publisher and writer(s) (the composer, and, if   ing work”: the musical composition itself, which is
          applicable, author or text copyright holder)—a much     owned by the publisher/copyright holder.
          higher  percentage  than the  traditional  10% royalty
          paid on sheet music. Self-publishers, of course, keep   • The “sound recording”: this particular recording
          “both halves” of licensing royalties (composer 50% and   of the musical work, which is typically owned by
          publisher 50%), but have much more work to do.          whoever  paid for or “produced” it—perhaps  a
            There are many types of licensing, and publishers’    composer and/or choir who hired a recording en-
          policies may vary on some of them, including license    gineer, produced a recording, and agreed on who
          to arrange (adapt/change original content), transcribe   would own that recording; or perhaps a record la-
          (translate to a new medium/instrumentation without      bel.
          altering  original content),  or orchestrate  copyrighted
          music (arrangement or orchestration license);       • The “video recording”: again, typically owned by
          to reprint copyrighted music as part of a collection or   whoever  produced  this video  recording of  the
          project (print license); to create performance tracks;   work.
          to broadcast recordings of the copyrighted music on
          radio or television (broadcast license), etc. Policies   The producer of a recording must secure a license
          for these types of licensing are best discussed directly   from the publisher (the copyright holder of the musical
          with individual publishers.                         work) in order to create their recording. The producer
                                 1
            In all these aspects, the publisher (traditional or in-  of the recording is then entitled to collect revenue from
          dependent/self) controls all rights to the original work,   their recording, but royalties are paid (in various ways,
          and the works may not be used or adapted without at   depending on the usages) to the publisher for the use
          least permission, and often a license (with an associated   of their copyrighted music. (As previously mentioned,
          fee) from the publisher, which generates income for the   these  royalties  are  then  split between  publisher and
          composer. Conductors, take note: when you properly   writer[s].)
          pursue permissions and licensing, you’re directly sup-
          porting choral composers!                           Mechanical Licensing and Royalties: Before the
            Some  types of licensing, however, have  standard-  internet,  this term simply  referred  to  the  license re-
          ized policies and mechanisms that control the revenue   quired by publishers when someone recorded and dis-
          treams. These licenses usually relate to the use of the   tributed a physical audio recording (e.g., a phonograph,
          musical work in audio or video recordings, and include   cassette, or CD) of a performance or “cover” of a pub-
          Mechanical  Licensing, Synchronization  (Sync)      lisher’s copyrighted music. This process is still in use
          Licensing, and Performance Licensing. These li-     for physical recordings, and can be done two different

          36      CHORAL JOURNAL  March/April 2023                                              Volume 63  Number 7
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43