Page 24 - CJFeb24
P. 24

Choral Vibrato: The Hundred Years’ War






           The 2023 ACDA National Conference featured an    and the extent is about a quarter tone above and below
        interest session titled “Let Vibrate! On Liberating the   the average fundamental frequency. Parts of the vocal
        Fullness of the Feminine Voice,” presented by Jennaya   tract, like the velum, laryngeal depressor muscles, lat-
        Robison, Sarah Brailey, Karen Brunssen, and Mari Es-  eral pharyngeal wall, base of the tongue, and epiglottis
        abel Valverde. The core message of the session reflect-  synchronize with the oscillations of the produced vi-
        ed a centuries-long debate about the use of vibrato in   brato.
        the choral situation. Debates about vibrato and choral   According to Seashore, one of the first researchers
        singing date at least as far back as the Late Renaissance.   of vibrato, human ears encounter difficulties with per-
                                                                                      7
        A  2007  Choral Journal author incorporated  historical   ceiving vibrato in four ways.  Firstly, our ears under-
        treatises discussing this issue as part of their explora-  estimate the extent and rate by about 1/4 or 1/2 of
                      3
        tion of vibrato.  Choral Journal published its first article   the actual values. Secondly, many listeners misclassify
        on the subject in 1962, though the author noted that   the oscillations of pitch as oscillations of intensity or
        the debate, in the United States of America, had begun   fail to recognize either. Thirdly, gross vibrato, or the
        at least forty years prior.  Forty years prior would have   vibrato from more than one source, elicits the phenom-
                              4
        been 1922, or just over a hundred years ago, hence the   enon of “sonance,” where successive periodicities fuse
        title of this article. Brailey’s post-conference Facebook   into  one  perceived  tone.  Fourth  and  finally,  our  ears
        post received numerous likes, comments, and shares,   confuse changes in pitch, intensity, and timbre with the
        demonstrating the pervasive and persistent interest and   oscillation of a semi-tone typical of a natural vibrato.
                                                        5
        controversy  surrounding choral  singing and vibrato.    Bringing multiple singers together, such as a choir, only
        As the panel of presenters reflected both vocal peda-  magnifies these complexities. Management of individ-
        gogues and choral directors, I chose to investigate the   ual vibratos presents many problems during the quest
        vibrato debate through a comparative analysis of arti-  for synchronization.
        cles from Journal of  Singing and Choral Journal. A synthesis   For these reasons and others, singers get called upon
        of thirty-seven publications from both journals helped   to produce “straight-tone” singing. This kind of singing,
        chronicle the debate, illustrated tactics from either side,   according to some, reduces harmonic intensity within
        revealed sources of common ground, and pointed to-  upper formants, thereby enhancing the perception of
        ward a potential pathway forward. First, however, is a   the fundamental tone.  Through the suppression  of
                                                                                8
        brief overview of vibrato and its complications.    timbrel variations between singers, unification of pitch
                                                            helps achieve a blended tone within a section. No tone,
                                                                                       9
                                                            however,  is without  vibration.   Achieving a  “straight
                      Defining Vibrato and                  tone,” or one with a decreased rate, may occur through
                       Perceptual Battles                   firmer adduction of the vocal folds or increased airflow
                                                                                          10
           Vibrato is a naturally occurring, vocal phenomenon.   through less adducted vocal folds.  This hyper- or hy-
        Singers produce vibrato by modulating the fundamen-  pophonation may result in vocal fatigue and even vocal
                                                                      11
        tal frequency of a tone through either change in sub-  pathologies.  Historically and contemporarily, singers
        glottal air pressure via use of the abdominal muscles   have and do sing “straight tone” without apparent in-
                                                        6
        or changes in the activity of the cricothyroid muscle.    jury or fatigue, fueling the debate between proponents
        Our ears perceive the oscillation of pitch, volume, and   of either using or eliminating vibrato within the choral
        timbre produced in a vibrating tone. These perceptions   setting.
        relate to the intensity of harmonics present within the
        tone, the vowel used and its related formants, the sub-  Not All Is Lost
        glottic pressure, and the closed quotient of the vocal   A third possibility exists. Trained singers have dem-
                                                                                                        12
        folds. Researchers  characterized vibrato in two mea-  onstrated the ability to synchronize their vibratos,  al-
        surable quantities: extent and rate. The rate of a typi-  though no definitive, empirical evidence explains how
        cal vocal vibrato is between 5 and 7 cycles per second,   this scenario occurs or may be achieved. Considering


        22      CHORAL JOURNAL   February 2024                                                 Volume 64  Number 6
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29