Page 52 - CJAug25
P. 52

Repertoire & Resources  - Tenor-Bass Choirs






        that choirs also warmed up and used the same tech-    His commitment to thematic programming is influ-
        nique as I had used in the voice studio,” Seelig recalls.   enced by his experience with GALA Choruses, a net-
        This foundational belief in vocal technique shaped the   work of  over  200  LGBTQ+-centered  choral  ensem-
        sound of the Turtle Creek Chorale and became a hall-  bles from around the world. Seelig believes that GALA
        mark of his choral leadership.                      Choruses  have  influenced  broader  choral  practices.
           He admits that the early years of his conducting ca-  “When  I came out and we were planning concerts
        reer were marked by trial and error. “I learned choral   that were themed, other people had no idea what in
        technique by the seat of my pants. I knew vocal tech-  the world that was,” he recalls. “We taught by example.
        nique very well. I knew conducting pretty well. But I   People started looking over the fence at the success of
        didn’t know how to communicate that as a conductor.”   gay and lesbian choruses and wondering how we were
        Over  time, he developed  a practical  and accessible   filling our audiences. Now, non-GALA choruses are us-
        approach that was tailored to his volunteer, commu-  ing thematic programming and ‘choral theatre’ more
        nity-based ensemble. “It was a matter of just commu-  than they ever did.”
        nicating as quickly and as easily as I could—a lot with   Seelig is also an advocate for expanding tenor-bass
        gestures and a lot with modeling.”                  repertoire. “The repertoire was sad at best,” he says of
           This pragmatic and practically applicable approach   his early career. “We had not begun writing for our-
        ultimately led to his widely used book, The Perfect Blend,   selves.” Since  then,  he has commissioned  numerous
        which originated from a suggestion by composer and   works and continues to push publishers to release more
        friend Greg Gilpin. “He said, ‘Just write down  what   tenor-bass repertoire. “Publishers still say the market
        you’re doing,’” Seelig recalls. The result was a resource   is not big enough. But in today’s age, you can publish
        that leveraged years of trial and error into a clear, relat-  digitally with no money.”
        able and often humorous guide for conductor-teachers.   Among his favorite pieces are those that reflect his
        At the heart of Seelig’s philosophy is a deep respect for   TLC philosophy. For laughter, he recommends Jonathan
        the music, the singers, and their time: “There’s only   Wilcox’s Musical Risotto and Eric Lane Barnes’s Land-
        one answer to a great rehearsal, and that’s preparation.   scapes. For tears, he cites Stephen Schwartz’s Testimony,
        To not plan a rehearsal within an inch of its life is dis-  a powerful work that has become a staple in LGBTQ+
        respecting your singers and their time.”            choral literature. And for chill bumps, he points to piec-
                                                            es like Morten Lauridsen’s O Magnum Mysterium and Ja-
                                                            cob Collier’s arrangement of Bridge Over Troubled Water.
                   Repertoire that Resonates                Ultimately, for Seelig, programming is about the con-

           For Dr. Seelig, programming is a deeply creative and   nection between the music and mission and performers
        meaningful task. “Choosing repertoire is both the most   and audience. “Music is not the end. It’s a means to the
        challenging  and most fun thing  any of us does,” he   end. And that end is to touch every possible emotion in
        explains. His approach is guided by intentionality and   a concert—maybe a couple of times.”
        emotional resonance, using what he calls the “TLC”
        model: tears, laughs, and chill bumps.
           Seelig  draws  a distinction between  programmers       Working with Tenor-Bass Choirs
        who build concerts  piece  by piece, and “top-down”   Seelig’s work with tenor-bass choirs includes a blend
        thinkers who begin with a thematic vision. “I’m more   of vocal pedagogy, ensemble psychology, and an un-
        of the top-down. I want to do a concert on butterflies.   derstanding of the opportunities and challenges these
        I can feel it. I can hear the applause. I don’t know any   choirs present. He emphasizes the importance of build-
        songs about butterflies, but I know it’s going to hap-  ing the sound from the bottom up. “It’s always built on
        pen,” he says to illustrate his point. For him, this imag-  a pyramid. I love a good choir with 21 first tenors, 30
        inative approach has led to concerts that are musically   second tenors, and 50 basses,” he jokes.
        compelling but also emotionally and socially impactful.  This approach is especially important in tenor-bass



        50      CHORAL JOURNAL  August 2025                                                    Volume 66  Number 1
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57