Page 23 - April.indd
P. 23

A Stylistic Synthesis






        “rel[y] on the division of speech into distinct, detach-  Martines’s more “Baroque” movements refl ect
        able units that carry meaning independently… which   this rhetorical tradition. A particularly striking exam-
                                                  34
        can then undergo various transformations.”  This    ple is her setting of the psalm’s fourth verse: not only
        view of rhetoric as a structuring principle forms the   does she closely associate each segment of text with
        basis for the discussion here of “rhetorical” approaches   a unique musical gesture, but the resulting sequence
        to text-setting.                                    of musico-textual motives closely resembles Handel’s
           Handel’s text-setting, particularly in choral move-  treatment of the same text. Both composers highlight
        ments, is highly “rhetorical” in this sense: by marrying   the gravity of “Juravit Dominus” with declamatory
        short phrases of text to distinctive musical ideas, and   choral homophony. Both composers then set “et non
        then subjecting the resulting musico-textual motives   poenitebit eum” to a contrasting motive, treated con-
        to a rigorous process of repetition and variation, he   trapuntally. Both composers conclude the verse with a
        explicitly builds his setting out of “distinct detachable   fugue involving two contrasting motives. In each case,
        units” that are constantly “transform[ed].” Some of   “Tu es sacerdos in aeternum” becomes the fugue sub-
        these motives entail a literal depiction of the text, as   ject; Handel sets “secundum ordinem Melchisedech”
        in the concussive repeated notes on “conquassabit,” or   to the countersubject of a double fugue, while Mar-
        the piling up of rapid passagework on “implebit ruin-  tines sets it to a motive that becomes the basis for the
        as.” Often, they amplify the text by closely refl ecting   fugue’s episodes. This close resemblance shows Mar-
        the natural rhythms of speech—for example, on phras-  tines’s mastery of the rhetorical, Handelian approach
        es such as “et non, non poenitebit” or “et Spiritui Sanc-  of creating and developing self-contained musico-tex-
        to.” In every instance, they take on meaning through   tual motives.
        constant reinforcement of their association with a giv-  In galant compositional practice, however, melodic
        en phrase.                                          structure was as much of a driving force as rhetorical










































        CHORAL JOURNAL  April 2021                                                                   Volume 61  Number 9          21
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28